Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
The Baker Sagegrouse Local Implementation Team Hereafter, Baker Lit Is Made Up of Several Partners Including the Tricounty Cwma, U.s. Fish Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Oregon Department of Fish Wildlife, Baker County, Powder Basin Watershed Council, and Private Landowners. the Overarching Goal of the Baker Lit Is to Strategically Implement Conservation Actions to Increase the Quality and Quantity of Sagebrush Habitat and Reverse Baker County Sagegrouse Population Trends. Although Some Populations in Oregon Show Stable or Even Increasing Populations, the Baker County Population Remains a Concern as the Population Has Decreased by an Estimated 91.7% Since 1960 19602023, Outpacing the Range Wide Decline of 83.8% Over the Same Period. While the Population Has Shown Some Improvement Over the Last Couple of Decades, Recovery Remains Slow, and a Proactive Approach Is Needed to Stabilize the Population. Conservation Actions Are Conducted Under the Baker Lits Strategic Action Plan Sap Which Guides Management Activities to Improve Sagegrouse Populations and Habitat. in 2019, the Baker Lit Was Awarded a S6.1 Million Grant Through Oregon Watershed Enhancement Boards Oweb Focused Investment Partnership Fip Program Which Provided a Muchneeded Financial Boost to Accelerate Sagegrouse Conservation Efforts Outlined in the Sap. After Several Years of Implementation Success, the Baker Lit Is Seeking Bil Conservation Delivery Funds to Build Upon Our Previous and Ongoing Habitat Restoration Work. Specifically, Projects Outlined in This Proposal Will Be Used to Focus on Areas Which Have Not Received Treatments Thereby Connecting and Expanding Upon Projects See Attached Map Resulting in Large Landscape Level Management. Efforts Are Primarily Focused to Treat Invasive Annual Grasses Iag and Noxious Weeds to Connect Fragmented Landscapes, Enhance Nest and Brood Rearing Habitat, and Reduce Wildfire Risk.
Committed
$105,446
Paid out
$51.6K
49%
Committed, not yet paid
$53.9K
51%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.