Federal grant · project grant (b)
Recent R3 Research Suggests That Many New and Prospective Hunters and Anglers Find State Fish and Wildlife Agency Websites Difficult to Navigate. These New License Buyers Especially Younger Generations That Agencies Are Trying to Attract Expect to Find Whatever They Are Looking for Online Within a Few Clicks. If They Cannot Buy a License or Find How-to Information Quickly and Easily, They Are Highly Likely to Abort the Attempt and Just Find Something Else to Do. Many Agencies Recognize This Is a Problem, But May Not Have the Resources to Determine How to Address It. the Fish and Wildlife Agency Digital Experience Index Will Provide All State and U.s. Territory Agencies With Individualizedassessments of Their Websites Along With Recommendations for Potential Improvements to Increase Recruitment, Retention, and Reactivation. Reports Will Be Shared Individually With Each Agency. Reports Will Not Chasten or Demean Agencies Digital Delivery Efforts, and They Will Not Compare Performance Between States. Rather, the Tools Will Be Offered as Guidance and Advocacy for Improving Online Experiences and Agency R3 Effectiveness Across the Nation.
Committed
$117,472
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…