Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
This Proposed Project Will Restore and Maintain Mesic and Riparian Habitat Function in Priority Watersheds Inwashington Shrub Steppe. Decades of Development Activities and Historical Uses Have Resulted in Heavily Incisedstreams Creeks and Wet Meadows Within the Shrub Steppe Ecosystem and Degraded the Ecological Integrity Andhydrologic Function. Conservation Partners in Washington Shrub Steppe Have Been Working With Anabranch Solutionsto Implement Stream and Wet Meadow Restoration Through Lowtech Processbased Techniques in Areas With Highrestoration Potential.this Project Will Result in the Restoration of Wet Meadow Habitat Important for Sagegrouse for Brood Rearing.additionally Nuisance Beavers Will Be Relocated Opportunistically to the Stream to Expand the Project Scope Andimpact and Provide Longterm Maintenance and Adaptive Management of the Desired Stream and Riparian Benefits.the Project Involves Installation of Beaver Dam Analogs Bdas and Postassisted Log Structures Pals at Siteslocated in the Upper Rock Island Creek Watershed Including Mainstem Rock Island Creek and Several Tributaries.
Committed
$45,000
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…