Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
The Objectives of the Project Are to (1) Maintain a Comprehensive, Centralized, and Regularly Updated Database on Relevant Metrics of Great Ape Populations, Which Is Available to a Broad Range of Stakeholders (2) Increase Capacity to Inform Effectiveness of Great Ape Conservation Interventions Through Accessible and Evidence-driven Tools and (3) Produce a Bi-annual Publication to Communicate the Distribution, Status, and Trends Impacting Great Apes, Coupled With an Issue-oriented Policy Brief to Provide Targeted Recommendations for Improved Evidence-based Conservation Aimed at Relevant Audiences. Activities Include: 1) Continuing Operation and Growth of the Database Through Identification, Acquisition, Processing, Standardization, Quality-checking, and Archiving of Data 2) Incorporating New Data Types (e.g., Camera Trap, Aerial Surveillance) 3) Incorporating Gibbon Survey Data 4) Incorporating Ape Health and Disease Data 5) Providing Data Services to the Great Ape Conservation Community 6) Supporting Updates to the Iucn Red List 7) Expanding the A.p.e.s. Wiki to Include the Majority of Great Ape Sites 8) Developing a Pilot Decision Support Tool to Measure Conservation Effectiveness and Inform Effective Allocation of Conservation Funds 9) Developing a Return on Investment Tool to Assist in Site Prioritization and 10) Producing a Bi-annual Publication Containing Iucn Green Status of Species Assessments a Summary of Conservation Status by Taxon, Population, and Country a Summary of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence for the Effectiveness of Interventions, Projects and Policies a Summary of Three Conservation Scenarios for Great Apes and Corresponding Gap Analyses and a Policy Brief on a Key Threat Faced by Great Apes.
Committed
$358,439
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…