Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)

Watershed Management Group, Inc

This Agreement Will Provide 55,000 00 to Watershed Management Group Recipient to Implement Community and Schoolyard Habitats and Work With a Private Landowner to Enhance Habitat for Migratory Birds the Landowners, Recipient, and Usfws Will Sign a Sub Recipient Landowner Agreement Exhibit 1 to Identify Work That Will Improve Habitat to Benefit Federal Trust Species the Sub Recipient Landowner Agreement Will Include a Project Narrative and Budget the Recipient Will Oversee the Implementation of the Landowner Agreement This Project Will Work to Enhance Pollinator Habitat, Riparian Habitat, and or Upland Habitat Areas Through Various Techniques on Private Land the Practices Include But Are Not Limited to, Installing Erosion Control Structures Rain Gardens, Cattle Exclusions, Restoring Native Plant Communities Increasing Plant Species Diversity and Improving Wildlife Habitat

Committed

$55,000

Paid out
$50.6K
92%
Committed, not yet paid
$4.4K
8%

How to read these numbers

One award, start to finish: Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed vs. ceiling: Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
Paid out: The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
The ledger: Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
The money bar: One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .

Source

This award on USAspending.gov ↗