Federal grant · project grant (b)
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) - Project Peer: Pacificorp’s Equity-aware Enhancement of Grid Resiliency the Primary Objective of Project Peer Is to Reduce the Impact of Extreme Weather Events, Particularly Wildfires, on Sections of the Electric Grid That Serve Disadvantaged Communities. the Project Focuses on Deploying Innovative Asset Hardening Solutions Using Critical Fire-resistant and Fire Prevention Technologies to Effectively Reduce or Eliminate Ignition Risks Caused by Overhead Utility Assets in the Area, and to Significantly Improve Electrical System Resiliency. Additionally, Peer Addresses Yurok Tribal Reliability Concerns by Upgrading Substation Assets and Adding Advanced Microprocessor Relays. the Comprehensive, Community-focused System Hardening Will Improve Resilience to Extreme Weather Events by (i.) Demonstrating Improvements in System Average Interruption Duration Index (saidi), (ii.) Reducing Ignition Risks From Overhead Distribution Lines, and (iii.) Introducing Pre-apprentice Graduates Into the Workforce.
Committed
$99.6 Million
Paid out
$34.9M
35%
Committed, not yet paid
$64.7M
65%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…