Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Saber - Site-air-basin Emissions Reconciliation. the Objective of This Study Is to Demonstrate That (a) High Frequency Sampling Can Be Used to Create Inventory Emissions Estimates That Accurately Represent Emissions in a Basin; and (B) the Proposed Method Can Be Replicated in Other Basins. the Project Will Perform Method Development and Validation in the Denver-julesberg Basin (DJ), in Northeastern Colorado. Planned Activities Include Project Management and Planning for All Budget Periods, Finalizing Project Governance Agreements, Planning the DJ Field Campaign, Planning the Upper Green River Basin (UGR) Field Campaign, and Finalizing and Synthesizing Project Data. Expected Deliverables Include the Project Management Plan, Completed Field Campaign Reports, Project Final Report, and Updated Deia Plan. the Study Will Result in Papers and Reports Describing the Methodology Required for Top Down/bottom Up Reconciliation, Problems Uncovered, and Proposed Protocol for Widespread Use.
Committed
$3.4 Million
Paid out
$2.3M
68%
Committed, not yet paid
$1.1M
32%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…