Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
[[the Goal of the Project Is to Build a Strong Technical Foundation Regarding Slag Design for the Development of the Hertha Green Iron & Steel Production Process. Ensuring the Optimal Slag Medium Is Fundamental to Successful Process Implementation.]] 3.1 Objectives [[the Project Has a Number of Objectives Stemming From the Role That the Slag Plays in Ensuring an Efficient and Effective Smelting Process.]] 3.1.1 Slag Composition Optimization [[the Core Objective Is to Optimize the Composition of the Slag Bath for Hydrogen Reduction of Iron Oxide in a DC Eaf. This Requires Attention to a Number of Specific Sub-objectives:]] 3.1.1.1 Iron Oxide Assimilation in the Bath [[to Design a Slag With the Ability to Quickly Assimilate the Iron Oxide Feed Through Dispersion and Dissolution.]] 3.1.1.2 Iron Oxide Reduction Rate [[to Optimize the Slag Composition for Rapid Hydrogen-slag Reaction Kinetics to Make Most Efficient Use of the Hydrogen Reductant.]] 3.1.1.3 Slag Heat Transfer [[to Ensure the Slag Has Appropriate Properties to Effectively Transfer Heat From the Area of Concentrated Heat Generation at the Electric Arc to the Iron Oxide Feed and Hydrogen Reductant.]] 3.1.1.4 Slag Bath Containment [[to Develop a Slag Composition That Allows for a Sustainable Slag Freeze Lining Compatible With the Desired Refractory Furnace Lining.]] 3.1.1.5 Slag-metal Separation [[to Optimize Conditions for the Separation of Metal and Slag Within the Constraints of Process Fluid Dynamics.]] 3.1.2 Evaluation of Refractory Compatibility [[to Understand the Reaction Mechanisms Between Different Refractory Materials and Slag Compositions. This Work Will Be Conducted by Idaho National Laboratory.]] 3.1.3 Integrated Slag-process Model [[to Construct a Process Model of the Slag Bath Which Integrates All Critical Features Covered in This Project to Quantitatively Predict the State of Each as a Function of Slag Composition and Operating Conditions.]] 3.1.4 Pilot Testing [[to Demonstrate 300 KG Per Day Scale Operation of Green Iron Production Through the Novel Hydrogen-electric Smelting Reduction Furnace. Success Will Be Demonstrated by Pilot Tests Which Assess Slag Design for the Integrated Process Where All Phenomena Are Present.]]
Committed
$1.7 Million
Paid out
$407.5K
25%
Committed, not yet paid
$1.2M
75%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.