Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
This Competitive Cooperative Agreement for a Research and Development Project Entitled, “performance Enhancement of Hydrokinetic Arrays Using Reliable, Low-cost Dynamic Components” Is Awarded to Emrgy Inc. Under Arpa-e Foa Number DE-FOA-0002335 (sharks Sbir-sttr) and Control Number 2335-1512. Emrgy Is Teaming With Premier Energy Holdings, Stanford University and the University of Tennessee, Knoxville to Propose a Pivot of Its Design to Address the Riverine Environment of the Foa’s S1 Case Study. the Primary Technology Challenges in the Riverine Environment to Be Addressed Include: 1) Achieving High Coefficients of Power (CP) at the Module Level Across a Wide Range of Operating Conditions in Less Confined Waterways; 2) Optimizing Array (multi-module) Performance; and 3) Lowering Capital and Opex Cost.
Committed
$3.0 Million
Paid out
$2.5M
83%
Committed, not yet paid
$519.7K
17%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…