Federal grant · project grant (b)
Up in Farms Will Develop a Mobilebased Quality Management System Designed to Address the Specific Needs of Small Farmers Particularly Those in the Mississippi Delta. This Project Will Increase Access to Technology Solutions for Quality Control and Food Production Planning on Smartphones and Tablets. the System Supports Food Tracking as Products Move Through the Midtier Value Chain Encompassing Processors Distributors and Retailers Ultimately Reaching Consumers. the Project Will Expand Regional Food Chain Coordination Enhance Midtier Value Chain Development and Reduce Onfarm Food Waste Through Targeted Tracking and Marketing Initiatives. This Will Directly Benefit Farmers and Stakeholders Throughout the Food System by Providing a Tool for Improved Traceability and Management of Their Products. Anticipated Outcomes Include Increased Operational Efficiency for Farmers Improved Food Safety Practices and Enhanced Market Access for Their Goods.
Committed
$499,958
Paid out
$442.8K
89%
Committed, not yet paid
$57.2K
11%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…