Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)

Consumer Protection Connecticut Department

The Purpose Is to Pay the State to Conduct Reviews at Grocery Stores,supermarkets, and Club Warehouse Stores on Behalf of Usda. Reviews Occurat Stores Throughout the State to Determine the Store's Compliance Withthe Country of Origin Regulations. the State Submits the Review Resultsto the Usda. Usda Analyzes the Results for Compliance and Enforcementactions. the Intended Beneficiaries Are Public Consumers Because Thereviews Help Ensure Stores Are Providing Accurate Country of Origininformation for Certain Food Items (lamb, Goat, Chicken, Fish,shellfish, Fruits, Vegetables, Peanuts, Pecans, Macadamia Nuts Andginseng) to Consumers as They Make Their Purchasing Decisions.

Committed

$97,000

Paid out
$72.4K
75%
Committed, not yet paid
$24.6K
25%

How to read these numbers

One award, start to finish: Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed vs. ceiling: Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
Paid out: The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
The ledger: Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
The money bar: One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .

Source

This award on USAspending.gov ↗