Federal grant · formula grant (a)
Description:this Agreement Provides Funding Under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) to the Hoopa Valley Public Utilities District to Develop and Implement Lead Service Line Identification Activities in Tribal Communities. Specifically, the Recipient Will Perform a Records Review and Pothole Service Lines to Identify Lead or Galvanized Requiring Replacement (GRR) Service Lines. This Assistance Agreement Provides Full Federal Funding in the Amount of $293,548. Pre-award Costs Have Been Approved Back to 6/1/2024. Activities:the Activities Include Performing a Records Review and Potholing of Service Lines to Identify Lead or Galvanized Requiring Replacement (GRR) Service Lines.subrecipient:no Subawards Are Included in This Assistance Agreement.outcomes:the Anticipated Deliverables Include a Complete Service Line Inventory. the Expected Outcomes Include a List Identifying Service Line Material to Determine Whether Replacement Is Necessary to Reduce Lead Exposure. the Intended Beneficiaries Include Residents of the Hoopa Valley Public Water System.
Committed
$293,548
Paid out
$92.0K
31%
Committed, not yet paid
$201.5K
69%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…