Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Description:this Agreement Funds the Recipient's Program to Conduct Health Education, Lead Dust Sampling and Public Outreach as Laid Out in the Remedial Action at the Omaha Lead Hazardous Waste Site, Which Is Listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan.activities:the Activities to Be Performed Include the Following Site-specific Actions Include Testing Inside Residents Homes of the Impacted Area, Providing Health Education to the Community and Medical Professionals and Reducing the Interior Lead Dust Exposure Risk.subrecipient:no Subawards Are Included in This Assistance Agreement.outcomes:anticipated Outcomes, Expected Deliverables and Intended Beneficiaries Include Reducing the Risk of Lead Exposure Specifically Benefiting Children Age 7 and Under Who Live in the Omaha Lead Superfund Site.
Committed
$7.3 Million
Paid out
$3.5M
48%
Committed, not yet paid
$3.8M
52%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…