Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Wasted Food Solutions (WFS) for Denver Will Identify Strategies to Increase Participation in and Adoption of Food Donation Efforts. WFS for Denver Will Connect With Local Government Agencies and Food Businesses, as Well as Food Banks and Food Rescue Organizations to Evaluate the Efficacy of Existing Strategies and Assets. Findings From This Work Will Be Synthesized Into a Report That Offers Denver a Roadmap for Furthering Diversion While Drawing on Proven Community Based Social Marketing Techniques for Exponential Benefits. This Project Addresses Epa's Need for Projects Focused on Source Reduction. Expected Outcomes and Outputs Include: Solicit Feedback From Stakeholders, and Review Current Food Recovery Efforts in Denver, Develop a Comprehensive Roadmap of Effective and Efficient Strategies for Furthering, Beneficial Reuse of Edible Food in Denver, Identify Food Recovery Best Practices, and Increase Awareness and Capacity for Beneficial Reuse of Edible Food
Committed
$19,526
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…