Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Description:this Agreement Provides Funding to Hampton Roads Sanitation District to Plan and Design Two Wastewater Improvement Projects as Directed in the 2024 Consolidated Appropriations Act or as Identified in an Approved Technical Correction If One Has Been Approved for This Project. Activities:the Activities to Be Performed Include the Execution and Implementation of a Wastewater Infrastructure Planning and Design Project. Workplan Activities Consist of Two Design Projects; Design of the Chincoteague Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements and Design of the Onancock Wastewater Treatment Plant Solids Handling Upgrades. Subrecipient:no Subawards Are Included in This Assistance Agreement.outcomes:the Anticipated Deliverables Include an Engineered Design for Each of the Chincoteague and Onancock Wastewater Treatment Plant Projects. the Expected Outcomes Include the Design Plans and Specifications Needed for Construction Improvements to the Wastewater Treatment Plants. the Intended Beneficiaries Include the Residents and Patrons of Towns of Chincoteague and Onancock, Va.
Committed
$1.3 Million
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…