Federal grant · project grant (b)
Description:this Project Will Evaluate the Bioavailability of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Agricultural Environments, Research Pfas Transport Into Secondary Animal Products, and Identify Previously Uncharacterized Sources of Pfas.activities:this Project Will (1) Characterize Pfas Partitioning in Plant Cultivation and Compare With Soil Type and Residual Treatment, (2) Evaluate Pfas Uptake in Fish Through Dietary Sources, (3) Measure Pfas Distribution Through Drinking Water and Food, and (4) Develop Mitigation Strategies for Pfas Accumulation.subrecipient:no Subawards Are Included in This Assistance Agreement.outcomes:anticipated Deliverables Include Inventories of Pfas Sources at Agricultural Facilities, Models to Predict Pfas Elimination, Final Reports and Peer Reviewed Articles. Expected Outcomes of This Research Includes the Development of On-farm Pfas Management Practices for Pfas. Intended Beneficiaries Include Farms, Agricultural Facilities, State and Local Regulators, and Consumers of Agricultural Products.
Committed
$1.6 Million
Paid out
$19.6K
1%
Committed, not yet paid
$1.6M
99%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…