Federal grant · project grant (b)
We Propose a Two-year Investigation to Demonstrate Higher-level Onboard Science Data Processing for More Intelligent Smallsats and Cubesats to Enable Future Earth Science Missions and Earth Observing Constellations. Low-cost Smallsat Architectures With Limited Numbers of Ground Stations Generally Suffer From Downlink Bottlenecks That Present Impediments to Delivering Large Volumes of Data to Science Algorithms Implemented on the Ground and Generating Timely Science or Operational Products. When Data Compression and Playback Cannot Provide a Complete Solution Data Acquisitions Per Orbit Must Be Sacrificed. This Is Highly Undesirable for Weather and Climate Objectives That Require Global-scale Observations. Our Approach to Resolving This Bottleneck Is to Disaggregate Science Data Processing and Embed Science Algorithms Onboard.
Committed
$806,476
Paid out
$551.0K
68%
Committed, not yet paid
$255.5K
32%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…