Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
The National Space Grant Foundation (foundation) in Response to Fy 2017 Nasa Exploration Systems and Habitation (x-hab) Project Competitive Cooperative Agreement Notice (CAN) Number NNK17UB01C Proposes the Following Initiative to Engage Undergraduate and Graduate University Project Teams in Support of Nasa S Vision and Mission. This Proposed Effort Will Provide Innovative Approaches to Address Nasa Identified Gaps in Knowledge and Capabilities Which Will Provide a Measurable Reduction in Technology Risk for Future Nasa Missions. the Foundation S Mission of to Promote and Provide Students With Transformational Stem Educational and Research Opportunities and to Support Public Engagement in Areas Related to Nasa S Missions Is Directly Aligned With the Objectives of the X-hab Program to Engage University Teams in Direct Support of Nasa S Vision and Mission. One of the Foundation S Primary Objectives Is to Facilitate Innovative Cost-effective and Efficient Partnerships Between Nasa S Field Centers and the Higher-education Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics Communities.
Committed
$1.3 Million
Paid out
$994.6K
75%
Committed, not yet paid
$333.7K
25%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…