Federal grant · project grant (b)
In the Proposed Work Comparisons Will Be Made Between Ionospheric E-region Parameters Derived From Guvi and Ssusi Auroral Fuv Images and Coincident E-region Observations by Ground-based Ionosondes. the Purpose of the Comparisons Is to Determine Whether the Relative Difference in Efficiencies Between Proton and Electron Aurora in Producing LBH Emission Is as Great as Is Indicated by Comparisons Between Ssusi and the SSJ/5 Particle Detector as Described in Knight Et Al. [J. Geophys. Res. 2008] and Correira Et Al. [J. Geophys. Res. 2011]. Recent Studies [knight Et Al. Under Review] Also Based on SSUSI-SSJ/5 Comparisons Indicate That the Difference Is Likely a Factor of ~3. This Difference in Efficiencies Has Important Implications for Auroral Fuv Remote Sensing Algorithms.
Committed
$5,612
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…