Federal grant · project grant (b)
Nearly 50% of Sun-like Stars in Our Galaxy Are in Binary Stellar Systems. Recent Discoveries by the Kepler Mission and Ground-based Surveys Have Shown That Dynamically Stable Planetary Systems Exist and Are Abundant Around Many Binary Stars. Future Missions Such as Tess and Plato Will Discover Nearby Planets in Binary Systems Which Could Be Further Characterized Spectroscopically With JWST. the Recently Launched Gaia Astrometry Telescope Which Observes 1 Billion Stars in Our Galaxy (1% of the Galactic Stellar Population) Is Providing Unprecedented Positional and Radial Velocity Measurements That Can Reveal Further Planets in Binary Systems. as With Planets Around Single Stars These Planets in Binary Systems Continue to Raise Questions About Their Potential Habitability. Previous Studies of the Habitable Zone (HZ) of Binary Systems Considered Only the Effect of Changes in the Peak of the Combined Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) of the Two Stars; However the Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) for Planets in Binary Systems Should Be a Superposition of Both Host Stars. Habitability Is Defined as the Ability of a Terrestrial Planet to Sustain Liquid Water on Its Surface Which Is Determined by the Energy Balance of a Planet S Atmosphere. Greenhouse Gases Like Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide Absorb Radiation at Both Long (infrared) and Short (ultraviolet) Wavelengths Which Makes the Climate Sensitive to the Full Combined Sed of Both Stars. We Expect That the HZ for Planets in Binary Systems Should Be a Function of the Sed of the Binary System Which Will Depend Upon the Evolutionary History of Each Stellar System. We Will Also Study the Differences in Diurnal Patterns of Solar Insolation Caused by Both P-type and S-type Planetary Orbits Within Binary Systems. We Expect the Orbital Configurations of Binary Systems to Play a Significant Role in the Definition of Habitable Zones. Methods This Research Will Constrain the HZ for Planets in Binary Systems by Using a Hierarchy of Existing Climate Models. We Will Use Observed Stellar Spectra and Stellar Evolutionary Models to Develop Several Scenarios for the Combined Sed of Both P-type and S-type Binary Systems. We Will First Study the Effect of Superposition of Multiple Stellar Spectra Using a Line-by-line Radiative Transfer Model. These Calculations Will Set Benchmarks for Evaluation of the Correlated-k Radiative Transfer Codes Used Subsequently. We Will Then Evaluate the HZ for Binary System in Combinations of F G K and M Types Using a One-dimensional Radiative Convective Climate Model Which Will Provide a Basis of Comparison Against Classic Single-star HZ Calculations in the Literature. We Will Next Use This 1-D Model to Parameterize the Radiative Transfer in a 2-D Latitudinal Energy Balance Model Which Will Allow Us to Consider the Contributions to Habitability of Non-circular Orbits and Ice-albedo Feedback. We Will Then Examine the Effect of Binary Sed on Atmospheric Dynamics by Using Full Three-dimensional General Circulation Models to Quantify Changes in Large-scale Circulation That Affect Habitability. by Using These 3-D Models We Can Self-consistently Simulate All Aspects of Climate Which Includes Geophysical and Orbital Properties Radiative Transfer Dynamics and Clouds. Relevance This Proposed Research Is Relevant to Nasa S Habitable Worlds Program as a Theoretical Study of the Climates of Extrasolar Terrestrial Planets and Their Ability to Sustain the Presence of Water. the Results of This Research Will Help to Identify the Characteristics and the Distribution of Potentially Habitable Environments in the Solar System and Beyond (C.4-1) by Using a Hierarchy of Existing Climate Models to Constrain the HZ of Planets in Binary Star Systems. the Scope of This Research Focuses on the Habitability of Extrasolar Planets So This Proposal Is Not Relevant to the Emerging Worlds Program the Exobiology Program or Any Existing Data Analysis Programs.
Committed
$488,566
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.