Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Purpose: the Purpose of This Project Is to Investigate and Document the Use of a Space Systems Reference Architecture to Assess If and How It Meets the U.s. Mission Objectives for Voluntary Consensus Standards to Support Industry Growth, Lower Trade Barriers, and Enable Self-regulation Within Regulatory Frameworks. This Award Will Be Funded by the Noaa Office of Space Commerce in Cooperation With Nist to Understand the Aerospace Sector's Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards Development and Use for Space Situational Awareness and Space Traffic Management.activities to Be Performed: 1. Determine Whether, and in What Qualitative Ways, a Reference Architecture for Space Is Currently Applied or Could Be Utilized by the Space Community. 2. Provide Qualitative Insights Into the Practical Use and Benefits of RASDSV2 Across Different Stakeholders by Evaluating the Extensibility and Scalability of RASDSV2.3. Shape Questions for Opportunities in Standardization, Integration, and Future Applications Within the Space Industry.expected Outcomes: the Researchers Will Develop and Use a Method to Explore Opportunities for Harmonization and Integration Within Space Data Standards Development, and Its Applicability to Mission and Project Design Teams in Development and Operations. Specifically, They Will Fill the Need to Understand the Current Use of a Reference Architecture for Space Data Systems by Assessing How This Standard, Which Is a Voluntary Consensus Standard, Is Meeting Critical Mission United States Objectives for Voluntary Consensus Standards to Support Industry Growth, Lower Trade Barriers, and Enable Self-regulation Within Regulatory Frameworks. Intended Beneficiaries: the Results Generated From This Research Can Be Used by Researchers Assessing the Value of Voluntary Consensus Standards for Space Systems. the Results Will Support Standard Developing Organizations and the Sectors They Support in Learning About How Voluntary Consensus Standards Are Being Used. Subrecipient Activities: the Recipient Does Not Intend to Subaward Funds.
Committed
$199,708
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.