Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Purpose: This Proposal Seeks Funding Under the Nist Mep Competitive Awards Program to Address Worker Shortages in the Manufacturing Industry With New Approaches to Employee Retention. the Project, Led by Kansas Manufacturing Solutions, Is a Six-state Mep Center Collaboration That Will Develop and Deploy a Holistic Approach to Employee Retention Applying Practical Application of U.s. Department of Commerce's Job Quality Toolkit and Best Practices From Around the Mep National Network.activities: the Three-phase Project Includes Program Development to Analyze Existing Workforce Retention Methods and Tools and Determine Gaps, Identify Practical Applications of the Eight Key Drivers of the Job Quality Toolkit, and Create Tools Such as Assessments, Roadmaps, and a Benchmarking-capable Database to Enhance Operational Performance and Employee Development. Project Deployment to Utilize the Tools Identified Above to Assess Gaps and Needs of Individual Small and Medium-sized Manufacturers (SMMS) in Each Geography and Initiate Interventions/projects That Address Employee Retention; Project Types Will Vary Based on Each Center's Capabilities But May Focus on Culture Analyses, HR Consulting, Employee Engagement, Employee Onboarding, Quality Management Systems Enhancements, Succession Planning, Leadership Development, Hiring Best Practices, Instructional Design, Coaching, Team Building, Emerging Leaders, Hands-on Skills Training, Quality Jobs, Trauma-informed Approaches to Culture Change, and Programs for People With Barriers to Employment in Manufacturing, Including Women, Unemployed Individuals, Underemployed Individuals, Justice-involved Individuals, and Underserved Communities. Evaluation/reporting/best Practice Sharing Which Will Include Nist/meis Reporting for Completed Projects, Consolidation of the Tools and Methods Identified Above Into a Workforce Retention Toolkit That Can Be Shared, Along With Findings and Success Stories, With the Mep National Network Through Webinars and Apply for Presentations at the National Mep Conference.outcomes: the Expected Outcomes of This Project Aim to Create Immediate and Long-term Benefits for the Manufacturing Sector: Economic Impact: 2,000 Companies Touched, 150 Companies Served (projects), and 2,000 Jobs Created/retained. Upskilled Workforce: Company Leaders, Management Team, and Employees Will Gain New Skills and Competencies, Aligning With the Demands of Modern Manufacturing Environments. Reduced Turnover: Enhanced Job Satisfaction and Engagement Through Targeted Retention Strategies Will Lower Turnover Rates. Added Capacity to Mep National Network: Products and Activities From Project Will Be Shared With the Mep National Network.beneficiaries: the Primary Beneficiaries Will Be the SMMS and Incumbent Workers in the Manufacturing Sector Across the Six States Involved in the Project. the Initiative Will Provide These Stakeholders With Advanced Tools, Knowledge, and Strategies to Tackle Workforce Retention Challenges.subrecipients: the Project Will Be Executed in Collaboration With Mep Centers Across Six States, Spearheaded by Kansas Manufacturing Solutions (kansas Mep). Subrecipients Include: Catalyst Connection (part of Pennsylvania Mep), Magnet: the Manufacturing Advocacy and Growth Network, Inc. (part of Ohio Mep), Manufacturer's Edge (colorado Mep), Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center (michigan Mep), and Polaris (rhode Island Mep). These Partners Will Lead Various Components of the Program, From Development Through Assessment and Implementation, Leveraging Their Regional Insights and Expertise to Maximize the Project's Impact and Share Best Practices Across the Mep National Network.
Committed
$5.0 Million
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.