Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
The Proposed Corridor Would Connect Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, to Las Vegas, NV, Providing New Service on a New High-speed Rail Alignment With Intermediate Stops at Hesperia and Victorville, Ca. the Corridor Sponsor Would Enter Step 1 of the Program to Develop a Scope, Schedule, and Cost Estimate for Preparing, Completing, or Documenting Its Service Development Plan.using Service Development Plan (SDP) Sow Framework, the Corridor Sponsor Will Develop a Project Performance Plan (task 2.1), Existing Planning and Development Materials Task 2.1), Statement of Work (task 2.2), Approved Project Schedule (task 2.3), Approved Project Budget (task 2.4). the Outcome of This Project Will Be the Project Description for Cid Step 2, to Perform the Necessary Work to Complete an SDP. the Proposed Corridor Will Connect Communities From Las Vegas, NV to Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, as Well as Communities in Between.
Committed
$500,000
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…