Federal award · other reimbursable, contingent, intangible, or indirect financial assistance
Workshop and Papers to Evaluate Local and Regional Factors Contributing to Entry and Growth of Beginning Farming Operations - Rangeland Ecosystem Dysfunction Associated With Increased Wildfire Activity, Invasive Annual Grasses, and Expanding Conifers Is Negatively Impacting Agricultural Production and a Variety of Ecosystem Services Across the Western United States. These Factors Have Severe Economic Implications; for Example, Federal Fire Suppression Expenditures in Fy 2017 Approached $3 Billion. the Increasing Frequency of Wildfires Across Western Rangelands Remains a Threat to Ecosystem Structure and Function. in Great Basin Rangelands, Wildfire Often Creates a Positive Feedback by Increasing Invasive Annuals and Altering Fuel Loading. Understanding the Dynamics of the Plant Community-both in Response to Wildfire and Its Role in Wildfire Occurrence-is Critical to Guide Rangeland Management in the Face of Fire, Fuels, and Invasive Plants. at Large Spatial Scales, Existing Fuel Modeling Efforts Have Shown That Antecedent Precipitation Amount and Pattern Can Be Used to Generalize Wildfire Probability. Missing From Those Efforts Has Been the Incorporation of Biotic Status (e.g., Plant Community Composition and Functional Group Abundance) Into Predictive Models. Incorporating Current Biotic Information Has the Potential to Dramatically Improve the Relevancy of Empirically-derived Models to On-the-ground Management Conditions and Decision Making. the Objectives of This Work Are to 1) Examine the Biotic Drivers of and Responses to Wildfire; and 2) Examine the Potential for Incorporating Biotic Components Into Abiotically-driven (e.g., Precipitation at Various Time Lags) Models for Predicting Wildfire and Plant Community Responses. Objectives Will Apply Across the Great Basin Region.
Committed
$92,505
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…