Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
This Agreement Supports the Secretary’s Priority of Promoting Economic Development in Rural America and Usda’s Statutory Obligation of Representing the Interests of Agricultural Producers and Shippers in Improving Transportation Services and Facilities by Evaluating the Potential Impacts of a Rail Merger to U.s. Agriculture and Informing Usda’s Submission on Any Future Merger Proceedings With the Surface Transportation Board (STB). the Project Will Evaluate the Impacts From a Major Class I Rail Merger on the Agricultural Industry; Conduct an Alternate Scenario Analysis by Examining How Benefits and Costs Change If Additional Railroads Merge; Identify Agricultural Market Segments at Risk From a Potential Merger; and Develop Guidelines to Inform STB on Potential Mergers to Protect the Interests of Agricultural Shippers and Exporters During the Merger Process. Project Findings Will Be Documented in a Public Report That Will Be Used by Usda to Submit Evidence for the Record During STB’S Open Comment Period on the Merger, as Well as in STB’S Merger Proceeding.
Committed
$100,000
Paid out
$35.5K
36%
Committed, not yet paid
$64.5K
64%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…