Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Sbir Phase Ii: Generative Design Technology for Robust, Editable, Manufacturable Solutions -the Broader Impact of This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase Ii Project Lies in Transforming Additive Manufacturing Design Processes to Enable Broader Adoption of Additive Manufacturing for End-use Applications. Additive Manufacturing Offers Substantial Advantages Over Traditional Manufacturing, Such as Reduced Material Waste, Integrated Part Design, and the Ability to Fabricate Complex Geometries. However, Existing Challenges in the Design and Simulation Processes, Such as Time-consuming Manual Methods and High Costs, Have Hindered Its Widespread Use. This Project Will Develop a Generative Design Tool That Automates and Optimizes Additive Manufacturing Part Designs, Significantly Reducing Computational Time and Costs While Improving Part Performance and Sustainability. by Streamlining the Creation of Editable, Robust Designs, the Technology Will Reduce Material Usage, Energy Consumption, and Environmental Impact. This Innovation Is Anticipated to Drive Adoption Across Industries, Including Aerospace, Medical, and Automotive, Facilitating More Efficient and Sustainable Manufacturing Practices. This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase Ii Project Seeks to Address the Inefficiencies in Additive Manufacturing Design Through Three Key Innovations: a Method for Generating Topology-optimized Editable Parametric Computer Aided Design Models, Machine Learning-enhanced Simulation for Accelerated Topology Optimization, and the Integrated Optimization of Build Orientation and Support Structures. Current Design Software Often Generates Large, Complex Files That Are Difficult to Edit, Resulting in a Time-consuming Additive Manufacturing Model Design Process. by Enabling a Dual-option Framework, the Proposed Generative Design Tool Will Allow Users to Choose Between Maximized Performance or a Balanced Approach That Includes Both Performance and Editability, Providing Insights Into How Different Design Priorities Affect the Final Output. the High Computational Demands of Existing Topology Optimization Techniques Have Limited Their Use in Designing End-use Parts. Additionally, Many Current Additive Manufacturing Processes Require Sacrificial Support Structures for Parts With Certain Inclination Angles, Which Increases Material and Energy Usage, as Well as Manufacturing Time and Cost. This Project Reduces Design Time, Making the Process Faster and More Cost-effective Without Compromising the Quality of the Optimized Design. by Generating Optimized, Support-free Designs, the Proposed Technology Will Reduce Material Costs, Manufacturing Time, and Environmental Impact, Making Additive Manufacturing More Efficient and Sustainable. This Award Reflects NSF'S Statutory Mission and Has Been Deemed Worthy of Support Through Evaluation Using the Foundation's Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Review Criteria.- Subawards Are Not Planned for This Award.
Committed
$1.5 Million
Paid out
$1.2M
79%
Committed, not yet paid
$311.4K
21%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.