Federal grant · project grant (b)
Conference: Publishing Guidelines for Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Care Principles -ensuring Indigenous Data Sovereignty Principles Are Embedded in the Research Ecosystem Is an Important Step to Ensure That the Move Towards Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) and Open Data Also Supports Equity and Justice for Indigenous Communities. These Care Publishing Guidelines (collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility and Ethics) Must Cover a Variety of Topics Ranging Across the Publishing Workflow, From Submission and Initial Evaluation to Peer Review, Production, and Post-publication Operations, and Must Have Buy-in From All Participants to Be Successful. the Team, Consisting of Authors of the Care Principles and Leaders From the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Publications and Open Science Leadership Teams, Will Convene an In-person/hybrid Workshop to Develop These Guidelines and Push Towards Adoption and Implementation. This Workshop, Which Has Been Preceded by a Series of Online Workshops and Meetings to Develop Draft Guidelines, Will Bring Together Indigenous Researchers, Editors, Publishers, and Boundary Spanners Around Adoption of the Care Principles, Discussion on Implementation Solutions and Concerns, and Feedback on the Draft Guidelines and Will Push Towards Implementation of the Care Principles in the Research Publication Ecosystem, Helping Embed Greater Justice and Equity in Research. This Award Reflects NSF'S Statutory Mission and Has Been Deemed Worthy of Support Through Evaluation Using the Foundation's Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Review Criteria.- Subawards Are Not Planned for This Award.
Committed
$49,041
Paid out
$8.3K
17%
Committed, not yet paid
$40.7K
83%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…