Federal grant · project grant (b)
Legal Characteristics of International Organizations -international Organizations (IOS) Are Institutions Formed by Multiple States to Pursue Commons Tasks Under International Law. They Have Become a Central Feature of Global Governance, Providing Means for States to Cooperate on Trans-border Issues Ranging From River Management to Climate Change. Examples Range From the United Nations and European Union to Small Organizations Like the Network of Aquaculture Centers in Asia-pacific. Despite the Vast Range of Activities Pursued by These Organizations, There Is Little Understanding of Their Internal Governance Features. Furthermore, in a World of Rising Authoritarianism, It Is Important to Understand How Non-democracies Are Using This Form to Advance Their Own Collective Projects. This Research Project Will Code a Comprehensive Global Sample of Io Charters, Which Are the Legal Documents That Create the Organizations. This Will Allow the Researcher to Identify and Analyze Key Characteristics, Such as Voting Rules, Budget Processes, Immunities, Secretariat Powers, and Systems of Dispute Resolution, in a Comprehensive Way. These Data Will Allow Scholars to Understand Whether and How Authoritarian-dominated Ios Are Systematically Different From Those Created by and for Democratic Countries. Besides Scholarly Research Outputs, the Project Will Produce a Public-facing Web Interface for the Charters, Which Will Provide a Valuable Resource for Scholars, Legal Professionals in the Field, and the Public. This Award Reflects NSF'S Statutory Mission and Has Been Deemed Worthy of Support Through Evaluation Using the Foundation's Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Review Criteria.- Subawards Are Planned for This Award.
Committed
$206,574
Paid out
$171.9K
83%
Committed, not yet paid
$34.7K
17%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…