Federal grant · project grant (b)
Research Coordination Network (RCN) for Privacy Preserving Data Sharing and Analytics -the Advance of Information Technology, Including Artificial Intelligence, Has Made the Collection, Analysis, and Use of Data Central to Research and Economic Activity. However, When Those Data Are About People and What They Do, There Are Risks to Privacy That Can Grow With the Sophistication of the Analysis. in Response, the Future of Privacy Forum Education and Innovation Foundation (FPF) Is Convening a Research Coordination Network (RCN) for Privacy Preserving Data Sharing and Analytics. the RCN Is Bringing Together Experts From Academia, Industry, and Government to Support the Development, Deployment, and Scaling of Privacy Enhancing Technologies (pets)?tools That Allow for Data Analysis Without Sacrificing Privacy. While Petsthey Can Mitigate Risk, There Are Many Factors Holding Back These Technologies? Widespread Use. One of the Biggest Stumbling Blocks to the Broader Adoption of Pets in Research Is the Current Lack of Clarity Regarding How Regulators Will Interpret and Enforce Privacy Rules When Organizations Use Them. the RCN Is Working to Resolve This Issue by Bringing Stakeholders Together to Discuss the Use of Pets and Explore How Rules and Standards Can Promote Their Appropriate Use. the Project Team Is Convening a Multidisciplinary, Cross-sector, and International Expert Group of Scholars and Practitioners Who Focus on Pets Development and Use to Understand the Risks of Data Sharing and Analytics for Marginalized and Vulnerable Groups, Along With Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Writ Large. This Work Is in Direct Response to Recommendations From the National Strategy to Advance Privacy Preserving Data Sharing and Analytics. Further, the Team Is Convening a Secondary Sub-network of High-level Regulators From Around the World That Will Inform and Respond to the Primary Network, Addressing the Legal Frameworks Relevant to Pets Adoption. With Input From Both Groups, the Project Team Is Developing and Disseminating New Guidance to Accelerate Progress Toward a Privacy-preserving Data-sharing and Analytics Ecosystem That Advances Democratic Values and Will Foster Convergence, Characterize and Strive to Narrow Persistent Differences, and Illuminate Options to Support Broad Deployment of Pets. the Team Is Examining Multiple Mechanisms for This Deployment, Including via New Technology, Law and Regulation, And/or Standards and Certifications. the Team Is Particularly Focused on Use Cases for Pets That Support Privacy-preserving Machine Learning and Pets That U.s. Federal Agencies May Need to Support the Equitable Use of Ai. This Award Reflects NSF'S Statutory Mission and Has Been Deemed Worthy of Support Through Evaluation Using the Foundation's Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Review Criteria.- Subawards Are Not Planned for This Award.
Committed
$490,133
Paid out
$319.7K
65%
Committed, not yet paid
$170.4K
35%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.