Federal grant · project grant (b)
A Human-centered Modeling Approach to Simulate Best Management Practices and Behaviors Under Uncertainty to Meet Water Quality Guidelines -when People Interact With Their Environment, They Often Induce Harm to the Water. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Is a Vital Method for Undertaking Water Quality Issues. It Sets Limits on How Much Pollution a Water Body, Like a River, Can Handle Each Day. Water Quality Best Management Practices (BMPS) Are a Popular Method to Prevent Pollutants From Entering the Water Bodies and to Achieve the Goals Set by TMDL. This Action Usually Requires Cooperation Among Different Experts, Data Sharing, and Engaged Stakeholder Involvement. This NSF Project Aims to Improve Our Understanding of How to Manage Water Quality Better at Different Spatial Scales. Three Theories Regarding Human-environment Interactions Will Lay the Groundwork for Our Analyses. This Project Combines Modeling, Data Analysis, and Surveys to Study Farmers? BMP Implementation Decisions at Different Spatial Scales. the Project Is Structured Around Three Research Tasks (RTS). RT1 Engages Stakeholders and Experts in the Project Advisory Board via Regular Meetings. the Research Team Interviews and Surveys Local Farmers to Evaluate Factors Influencing the Implementation of BMPS in the Study Area. RT2 Involves the Development of a Two-way Coupled Agent-based Water Quality Model, in Which Farmers Are Agents. the Model Simulates the Agents? Decisions and Implementation of BMP Using the Bayesian Inference Method Based on Socio-psychological Theories. RT3 Uses Numerical Experiments to Evaluate the Effect of Future Climate and Socioeconomic Scenarios and Human Behavior Uncertainty on TMDL Targets. These Scenarios Are Co-developed With the Project Advisory Board and Disseminated in the Project Wrap-up Workshop. This Collaborative Project With Real-world Practitioners in the Chesapeake Bay Produces and Shares Results to Inform the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee of the Chesapeake Bay Program. This Award Reflects NSF'S Statutory Mission and Has Been Deemed Worthy of Support Through Evaluation Using the Foundation's Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Review Criteria.- Subawards Are Planned for This Award.
Committed
$399,900
Paid out
$151.0K
38%
Committed, not yet paid
$248.9K
62%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.