Federal grant · project grant (b)
Cue-m: Level Up: Charting a Pathway Toward Inclusive Computing -this Project Aims to Serve the National Interest by Building Consensus for a United Vision of Undergraduate Computing Education Around the Areas of Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessible Learning. the Goal of This Project Is to Move the Needle on Several of Computing?s Biggest Challenges in Undergraduate Programs. Examples of Challenges Include How to Manage Booming Enrollments in Computing Without Damaging Diversity Efforts and How to Widen a Domestic Path to PHD Programs. Computing Education Continues to Face Challenges Around Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessible Learning. While Several Departments and Colleges Are Achieving Major Successes in These Areas, Many Others Are Lagging. Change Is Possible With a Coordinated Effort Among Computing Department Leaders and Faculty. All Universities and Colleges Need to ?level Up? and Implement the Best Practices That Broaden Participation in Computing. to Achieve the Goal of Developing Consensus on a Shared Vision of Change, a Series of Regional Workshops Will Be Held Where Faculty Across the Country Will Meet and Build Consensus Around Inclusive Computing Education. the Project Will Utilize an Equity Lens and Involve Several NSF BPC Alliances and BPC Community Members. the Results of the Workshops Will Be Compiled, Summarized, and Disseminated Nationwide in an Evidence-based Report of Best Practices Towards Inclusive Computing. This Project Will Involve Faculty From Diverse Institutions, Representatives of the NSF Broadening Participation in Computing Alliances, and an Advisory Board of Highly Respected Computing Educators and Professionals. the Advisory Board Will Coordinate the Creation of the Final Report. This Award Reflects NSF'S Statutory Mission and Has Been Deemed Worthy of Support Through Evaluation Using the Foundation's Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Review Criteria.
Committed
$1.0 Million
Paid out
$963.1K
96%
Committed, not yet paid
$36.9K
4%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.