Federal grant · project grant (b)
Collaborative Research: Scaffolding Middle and High School Students? Scientific Evaluations of Sources and Alternative Claims in Earth and Environmental Sciences -contemporary Scientific and Social Issues, Such as Water Security or Climate Change, Are Often Complex and Interrelated. This Requires Reasoned and Scientific Evaluations to Determine Appropriate Responses. Although Reasoned and Scientific Evaluations May Be Challenging for Students, Well-designed Instructional Materials May Facilitate the Teaching and Learning of Contemporary Scientific and Social Issues. Students Learning About These Socioscientific Issues Encounter Both Scientific Sources That Represent Current Consensus and Understanding as Well as Everyday Information Sources That May Not Be Consistent With Current Science. This Project Addresses Tools to Support Students in Reading and Evaluating a Variety of Sources to Compare Various Claims Addressing Socioscientific Issues. It Draws on Literacy Concepts From Science Education and Social Studies to Develop and Implement Scaffolding Tools That Can Support Students' Understanding of the Links Among Data, Evidence, and Claims While Considering the Trustworthiness and Plausibility of Sources. the Project Will Design and Test Such Instructional Scaffolds With the Goal of Helping Middle and High School Science and Social Studies Students to Deepen Their Evaluation Skills as They Make Reasoned Evaluations as Expected of Citizens in a Functional Democratic Society. the Project's Fundamental Research Questions Are: (1) What Are the Features of Instructional Scaffolds That Support Middle and High School Students to Develop More Critical Source Trustworthiness and Claim Plausibility Evaluations? (2) When Engaging in These Instructional Scaffolds, How Do Students' Evaluations Relate to Their Shifts in Trustworthiness and Plausibility Judgments Toward Justifiable Understandings (e.g., Based on Evidence and Reasoning)? (3) How Do These Evaluations and Judgments Relate to Changes in Students? Core Disciplinary Knowledge of Social, Civic, and Scientific Concepts Related to Socioscientific Issues? the Project Will Develop Complementary Instructional Scaffolds to Support Source and Claim Evaluation and Conduct Professional Development Sessions With Pairs of Middle and High School Science and Social Studies Teachers to Enable Them to Implement These Scaffolds in Their Classrooms Effectively. Furthermore, the Project Team Will Conduct Rigorous Classroom-based Tests to Gauge Students' Engagement, Reasoning, and Understanding of the Fundamental Scientific, Social, and Civic Phenomena Underlying These Topics. the Project Team Anticipates That These Scaffolds Will Support Students' Reasoning and Deepening Understanding of Socioscientific Phenomena. the Discovery Research PREK-12 Program (DRK-12) Seeks to Significantly Enhance the Learning and Teaching of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) by PREK-12 Students and Teachers, Through Research and Development of Innovative Resources, Models and Tools. Projects in the DRK-12 Program Build on Fundamental Research in Stem Education and Prior Research and Development Efforts That Provide Theoretical and Empirical Justification for Proposed Projects. This Award Reflects NSF'S Statutory Mission and Has Been Deemed Worthy of Support Through Evaluation Using the Foundation's Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Review Criteria.
Committed
$133,950
Paid out
$96.8K
72%
Committed, not yet paid
$37.1K
28%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.