Federal grant · project grant (b)
Pesticide Risk Assessments Are Used to Evaluate the Potential for Harm That Pesticides (insecticides, Herbicides, Fungicides, Etc.) Pose to Non-target Organisms, Such as Pollinators. Risk Is Assessed by Considering Both the Quantity of Pesticide Exposure in Relevant Scenarios and the Level of Harm Caused by That Exposure. the Overarching Goal of This Project Is to Obtain the Knowledge and Data Needed to Accurately Assess the Impacts of Insecticides on Solitary Bees, Which Are Important Pollinators for Many Crops. While More Information About Insecticide Risk Exists for Honey Bees, These Bee Species Do Not Share the Same Routes of Exposure, Have Different Life History Traits, and Are Managed Differently in Agricultural Systems. We Will Investigate Insecticide Exposure and Effects on Two Solitary Managed Bee Species, the Alfalfa Leaf Cutting Bees (ALCBS) and Alkali Bees. These Species Are Among the Most Intensively Managed Solitary Bee Species in the World and Have Been Proposed as Candidate Model Species for Risk Assessment in Bees That Are Not Honey Bees. We Aim to Significantly Advance the State of Knowledge Concerning Solitary Bee Exposure to Pesticides in Alfalfa Seed Crops, Develop Modeling Tools to Predict These Exposure Amounts, Build a Database of Toxicology Endpoints for Use in Pesticide Risk Assessments for Solitary Bees, and Conduct Case Study Risk Assessments. This Work Will Proceed by Conducting Field Trials With Four Selected Insecticides, Lab Experiments, and Insecticide Fate Modeling. Ultimately, This Work Will Be Used to Help Design, Evaluate, and Improve Pesticide Management Strategies That Balance Crop Protection Needs and Pollinator Protection.
Committed
$749,984
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…