Federal grant · project grant (b)
This Project Proposes the Development of the Technical Resource for Evaluating and Enhancing Municipal Arboriculture Planning (tree-map), a Practical Software Tool Designed to Help Communities, Including Rural Towns and Smaller Municipalities, Integrate Forestry Resources Into Their Transportation and Infrastructure Planning. by Providing Actionable Data and Planning Tools, Tree-map Will Enable Municipal Leaders, Forest Owners, and Foresters to Identify High-impact Areas for Tree Planting Along Transportation Corridors, Evaluate Potential Economic Benefits, and Align Forestry Initiatives With Infrastructure Investments.without This Resource, Rural Communities Risk Missing Opportunities to Create New Revenue Streams for Forest Owners, Generate Jobs in Forestry Services, and Strengthen Local Economies. Tree-map Directly Supports Usda and Administration Priorities in Rural Economic Development, Smarter Infrastructure Investment, and Efficient Use of Agricultural and Forestry Resources. by Linking Forestry With Municipal Planning, This Tool Helps Communities Develop New Markets for Forestry Products and Services While Driving Local Economic Growth. Overall, This Project Will Enable Forest Owners and Foresters to Better Align Their Resources With Municipal Needs, Creating Economic Opportunities for Them.in Addition to Economic Benefits, Tree-map Helps Communities Make Informed, Data-driven Decisions to Improve Infrastructure and Resource Management. the Tool Connects Transportation and Forestry Planning, Allowing Even the Smallest, Most Isolated Communities to Access Modern Solutions That Build Economic Opportunities and Long-term Growth. Through This Effort, Usda Can Further Integrate Forestry as a Key Driver of Rural and Municipal Development, Benefiting Forest Owners, Local Economies, and the Broader Agricultural Sector.the Project Has Four Primary Objectives: (1) Data Collection and Processing, (2) Model Training and Algorithm Evaluation, (3) Web Application Development, and (4) Stakeholder Engagement
Committed
$175,000
Paid out
$92.3K
53%
Committed, not yet paid
$82.7K
47%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.