Federal grant · project grant (b)
Small to Mid-size Farms Increasingly Face the Competing Demands of Maintaining Traditional Agricultural Operations While Feeling Pressured to Lease Prime Farmland to Solar Power Developers as a Means of Financial Survival. the Expansion of Solar Energy on Farms Presents an Existential Challenge, as the Land Required for Solar Installations Directly Competes With Acreage Needed for Conventional Farming, Forcing Difficult Decisions About Resource Allocation and Land Use.beyond Surface-level Concerns, the Impact of Solar Installations on Soil Quality Is Critical. the Construction of Ground-mounted Solar Arrays Typically Requires Heavy Machinery, Which Can Cause Soil Compaction. Compacted Soil Reduces Porosity, Leading to Decreased Water Infiltration, Poorer Aeration, and Impaired Root Growth--factors That Can Significantly Diminish Soil Health and Undermine Future Agricultural Productivity. Furthermore, Modern Solar Arrays Are Often Effectively Permanent, With Support Structures Driven Deep Into the Ground, Creating Lasting Obstacles to Returning the Land to Farming.roll-a-rack Solar Racking Addresses These Challenges. This Innovative System Requires Only Half the Land of Conventional Racking Systems. Roll-a-rack Is a Ballasted Design, Secured by Weight Rather Than Ground Penetration, So It Does Not Puncture or Attach to the Soil. Its Simple Construction Allows for Easy Dismantling and Relocation to Accommodate Crop Rotation, and When Decommissioned, the Land Remains Agriculturally Viable.by Allowing Farms to Remain Productive While Generating Stable Income Through Solar Energy Leases, Roll-a-rack Supports Food Security, Soil Health, and the Well-being and Resilience of Agricultural Communities.
Committed
$131,494
Paid out
$77.5K
59%
Committed, not yet paid
$54.0K
41%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…