Federal grant · project grant (b)
Most Marine Fish Farming for So-called 'CARNIVOROUS' Fish - I.e. Fish That Eat Other Fish, or Other Animals - Relies on More Expensive Diets, Limiting Growth of Marine Aquaculture and Increasing the Cost of Products to Us Consumers. However, There Is Tremendous Potential for Farming Herbivorous Marine Fish - I.e. Those That Eat Plants, or Seaweeds - as These Diets Would Be More Affordable, With Benefits for Fish Farmers, Us Crop Farmers and Us Consumers.this Research Tests a Range of Plant-based Diets in Herbivorous Fish Culture, to Evaluate Growth Rates, and the Taste Once the Fish Are Harvested. the Goal Is to Identify Less Expensive Diets for Herbivorous Marine Fish That Still Result in Fish That Are Tasty. If Successful, Lower-cost, Plant-based Diets Could Lead to Expanded Marine Fish Farming; Greater Market Opportunities for Us Corn and Soy Farmers; More Locally-grown, Affordable Fish for Us Consumers; Fewer Aquaculture Imports and Increased Us Food Security.
Committed
$174,897
Paid out
$131.9K
75%
Committed, not yet paid
$43.0K
25%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…