Federal grant · project grant (b)
Awards Issued Prior to January 20, 2025, Were Funded Under Previous Administrations and May Not Reflect the Priorities and Policies of the Current Administration. Controlled Environment Agriculture (cea), or the Production of Food Crops in Greenhouses and Indoor Spaces, Is Expected to Increase 5-FOLD in Market Size Over the Next Ten Years. Cea Increases Food Security and Reduces the Number of Miles That Food Needs to Travel Before It Reaches CONSUMERS' Plates. It Also Helps Produce More Fresh Fruits and Vegetables on a Year-round Basis, Thus Helping Reduce Nutritional Insecurity. Despite These Benefits, Cea Infrastructure Is a Massive Energy Consumer and, in Its Current Form, Is Fundamentally Incompatible With a Low Carbon Economy. Much of This Energy Is Used for Climate Control, Artificial Lighting, and Chemical Fertilizer. Our TEAM'S Long-term Goal Is to Transform Cea Strategically, Managerially, Technologically, and Socially to Reposition It as a Viable Food Production System Capable of Producing Sufficient and Nutritious Foods Within the Low-carbon Economy. This Project Is Supported by the Cea Industry: a Comprehensive Survey of 35 Horticulture Producers Reveals Strong Interest in Sustainable Practices, Water Quality and Quantity, and Labor Shortages. This Project Is Informed by an Advisory Board Composed of Stakeholders Representing Both Production Agriculture and Cea Equipment Vendors.our Long-term Objectives Are to 1) Reduce the Demand for Heating and Cooling in Cea Food Production Environments, 2) Improve the Overall Efficiency of Cea Climate-controlled Environments, 3) Lower the Carbon Intensity of Resource Inputs, and 4) Shift Consumer and Producer Behavior Surrounding Cea Products and Practices. to This End, We Are Engaging in Research, Education, and Outreach Activities in a Wide Range of Fields Including Plant Biology, Horticulture, Biosystems Engineering, Computer Science, and Economics. the Outcome of This Multi-discipline Approach Will Be to Create New Breeds of Plants That Are More Tolerant to Extreme Temperatures and Cropping Strategies That Lower Energy Demand. Additional Benefits Include the Demonstrated Use of Bioenergy and Wastewater for Plant Production, Optimal Greenhouse Control Strategies, Education of Current and Future Producers, and Insights Into How Consumers View Green Cea Produce. These Outcomes Directly Benefit the Us Cea Industry Which Is Over $74 Billion in Size With an Expected 10% Annual Growth Rate. to Ensure the Long-term Sustainability of the Industry, Such Massive Growth Must Be Accompanied by Appropriate Reductions in Energy Use, Improvements in Energy Efficiency, and a Switch to Clean Energy Sources - All of Which Are Outcomes of This Project. Our Efforts to Reduce Carbon Emissions From Cea Will Have the Secondary Benefit of Lowering Energy Consumption and Costs for Producers as Much as 25%. With Energy Bills Making Up a Large Component of Production Costs, This Would Be a Huge Win for Farmers, Consumers, and the Environment.
Committed
$9.9 Million
Paid out
$4.6M
46%
Committed, not yet paid
$5.4M
54%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.