Federal grant · project grant (b)
Awards Issued Prior to January 20, 2025, Were Funded Under Previous Administrations and May Not Reflect the Priorities and Policies of the Current Administration. Climate Change Induces Extreme Abiotic Stresses Such as Drought and Salinity, Which Are Detrimental to Agricultural Production. Plants Native to Drought and Salinity Stress-affected Regions Can Thrive in Those Conditions Due to the Interactions With Their Rhizosphere, a Rich Habitat of Various Microbes That Directly or Indirectly Affect Plant Growth and Development. the Intermountain West Region in the Us Is Rich in Drought-tolerant Native Plants and Recommended for Low-water Landscape Plants. Native Plants in This Region Have Formed Symbiotic Relationships With Native Wildlife Over Thousands of Years and Offer the Most Sustainable Habitat. Although Many Plant Growth-promoting Bacteria (PGPB) Isolated From Plant Rhizospheres Are Used as Successful Biofertilizers, Native Plants Have Not Been Explored for Their Microbiome. One Way to Meet the Increasing Food Demand Due to the Escalating World Population Is by Exploring the Microbiome of Native Plants That Helps Them Establish and Survive in Their Habitat. the Proposed Project Will Investigate the Microbiome of Two Native Plants,ceanothus Velutinus(snowbrush),cercocarpus Ledifolius(mountain Mahogany), of the Intermountain West Region of the Us, and Plants From the Great Salt Lake. the Study Will Then Isolate, Purify, Characterize the Rhizosphere Bacteria, and Test Them for Plant Growth Promotion Under Abiotic Stresses on the Model Plant Arabidopsis. Selected PGPB Will Be Characterized Further by Whole Genome Sequencing and Will Be Validated on Selected Grain (maize and Wheat), Vegetable (onion and Watermelon), and Forage (alfalfa) Crops. the Natural Microbiome of Native Plants Will Help Mitigate Crop Yield Reductions Caused by Abiotic Stresses.
Committed
$849,928
Paid out
$288.1K
34%
Committed, not yet paid
$561.8K
66%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…