Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Awards Issued Prior to January 20, 2025, Were Funded Under Previous Administrations and May Not Reflect the Priorities and Policies of the Current Administration. Since 1987, the Intertribal Agriculture Council (IAC) Has Promoted the Indian Use of Indian Resources for the Benefit of the Indian People. Contending With Systemic Oppression, Historical Discrimination, and Purposeful Exclusion From Generations of Usda Programming, Posed a Bleak Reality for Indian Producers in the 1980'S But Presented an Immense Potential for Growth Through the Eyes of the IAC'S Founding Leadership. Carrying Forward This Effort Has Trained the Iac to Be the Most Effective Organization in Service to Our Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers of Indian Country. Working Across Nearly Four Generations Has Rooted Our Staff in Knowing the On-the-ground Needs of Socially Disadvantaged Producers Pursuing Usda Programs. for These Reasons, the Iac Proposes the Work Set Forth in This Cooperative Agreement That Will Not Only Maintain Service to More Than 80,000 American Indian Producers But Will Also Share Our Experiences to Better Inform the USDA'S Approach to Outreach in Indian Country.programmatic Offerings Have Expanded Over 34 Years to Directly Address the Needs of Socially Disadvantaged Communities. a Robust and Dynamic Team of Tribal and Indigenous Community Members and Allies Distribute a Suite of Producer-focused Resources Rooted in Promoting Equitable Agricultural and Food Systems for Indian Country. Informed by the Trade Routes and Food Systems That Existed on This Continent Before Colonization, Iac Seeks to Address Systemic Inequities to Better Serve Native Producers and Indian Country as a Whole.
Committed
$10.0 Million
Paid out
$6.6M
66%
Committed, not yet paid
$3.4M
34%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…