Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Healthy Food Incentive Providers (i.e., Gusnip Grantees) Have Varying Capacity and Resources to Carry Out Comprehensive Evaluation and Reporting and Often Face Barriers to Implementation. the Ntae Aims to Maximize the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gusnip Projects in Meeting Gusnip Priorities, Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Purchases, and Improving the Nutrition of Participating Households. the Collective Group of Partners Forming the Ntae Include a Broad and Deep Cross-section of Experts in the Area of Healthy Food Access, Food Insecurity, Food Incentives, and Evaluation and Reporting. the Ntae Will Yield a Streamlined and Integrative Clearinghouse for Training and Technical Assistance (t&ta), and Reporting and Evaluation (r&e), to Support Gusnip Grantees Over the Next Four Years Toward the Intended Impact of Improving Health Outcomes of Snap Households and Decreasing Associated Health Care Costs.the Proposed Ntae Center Has Two Key Goals: (1) Develop Systems, Infrastructure, and Collaborative Relationships Using a Community-informed Approach to Support Gusnip Grantees R&e While Building Sustainability and Capacity; and (2) Maximize Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gusnip Projects in Meeting Gusnip Priorities, Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Purchases, and Improving the Nutrition of Participating Households. Strategies for the Ntae Will Be Rooted in a Collaborative Format With Usda and Other Stakeholders, Using a Bottom-up Approach Informed by Needs and Capacity of Prospective Gusnip Grantees as Well as Existing and Yet to Be Developed Technology That Will Provide Infrastructure for Collecting Key Information Related to T&ta and R&e. the Overarching Benefit of the Ntae Will Be Increased Capacity of Gusnip Grantees and Reporting of Process and Outcome Metrics That Will Help Inform the Continued Efforts of Healthy Food Incentive Programs.
Committed
$31.0 Million
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…