Federal grant · project grant (b)
Livestock Grazing Can Reduce the Ecosystem Services Supplied by Public Rangelands. Despite This, Public-land Stakeholders Expect Rangelands to Provide Increasing Levels of Multiple Ecosystem Services. a Common Solution to Balance Grazing and Other Ecosystem Serivces Is to De-stock Rangelands - But This Can Harm Rancher Livelihoods. as an Alternative, We Examine How Grazing Systems That Alter Grazing Duration (the Amount of Time Cattle Are Grazed in a Location) and Timing (when in the Season Cattle Are Grazed) Can Improve Ecosystem Service Supply. the Goal of Our Research Is to Demonstrate That Innovative Grazing Strategies Can Maintain a Diverse Suite of Ecosystem Services on Public Lands While Also Supporting Producer Livelihoods.we Will Focus on Stream Areas, Which Are Key Locations for Ecosystem Service Production in Arid Rangelands, and Examine Services Desired by Local Stakeholders, Including: Water Quality, Sage-grouse Habitat, Erosion Control, and Forage Recovery. We Will First Link Ecosystem Service Supply to Grazing Duration and Timing by Comparing Service Generation Among Commonly Employed Grazing Systems in Our Region. These Include: Continuous-turnout (which Is a Long-duration System) and 4-PASTURE Rotation (which Is a Medium-duration System). We Will Also Meausre Ecosystem Service Generation on Pastures Managed via an Innovative Watershed Scale, Time-controlled Rotation System Used on Private Rangelands (which Is a Short-duration System). Next, We Will Capitalize on a Collaborative, Local Management Project That Will Alter Current Public-lands Continuous-turnout and 4-PASTURE Grazing Systems to the Time-controlled Rotation. We Will Use This Project to Determine How Ecosystem Services Can Increase When Grazing Is Switched to the Short-duration System. Finally, to Ensure That Such Innovative Grazing Management Can Be Adopted by Ranchers, We Will Collect Data on the Costs Ranchers Incur When Switching to the New System, and Couple the Costs With the Measured Gains in Ecosystem Services Realized Under the New Management System. This Is a Critical Link to the Development of Incentive Programs That Help Managers Establish Sustainable Grazing Systems That Supply Multiple Ecosystem Services on Us Rangelands.
Committed
$466,209
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.