Federal grant · project grant (b)
In the United States, Hate Crimes (also Known as Bias Crimes) Are Complex, Significantly on the Rise, and Often Vastly Underreported. They Are Distinct From Other Crimes Because Their Impact Is Felt Not Only by the Victim But Also by Other Members of the Targeted Group. a Large Body of Research Exists on General Hate Crime Topics Such as Prevalence, Causes, Consequences, and Related Issues, But Research Specifically Examining Hate Crime Interventions Is Lacking. the Purpose of This Project Is to Conduct a Mixed-methods Evaluability Study of the Bureau of Justice Assistance-funded Not in Our Town (NIOT) Hate and Bias Action Teams (HBAT) Model. the Primary Activities Will Be to: 1) Develop a Generalized Hbat Model; 2) Validate the Generalized Model; 3) Conduct Implementation Case Studies of the Model; and 4) Develop a Preliminary Evaluation Plan to Assess the Generalized Models Effectiveness. (the Project Is Phase One of a Larger Process to Evaluate the Hbat Model; Phase Twothe Subject of a Future Effortwill Entail Executing the Evaluation.) the Proposed Study Will Produce Outcomes That Represent Major Contributions to the Field of Hate Crime Prevention and Intervention. First, It Will Advance Our Understanding of How to Address Hate and Bias Crimes in a Community Context, by Mapping the Niothbat Activities That Are Intended to Bring About Change and the Results That Can Be Realistically Expected From Those Activities. Second, It Will Result in the Development of a Program Implementation Guide for Use by Advocates Interested in Developing Programs to Address Hate Crimes in Their Communities. Third, It Will Make an Essential Contribution to the State of the Science Regarding the Evaluation of Programs Seeking to Reduce Hate Crimes, Through the Development of a Niothbat Evaluation Plan That Will Provide Solutions to the Unique Challenges (e.g., Defining the Intervention, Defining Success, Defining the Treatment Group, Powering the Design) That Plague Hate Crime Community-level Interventions. the Projects Service Area Consists of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Bloomingtonnormal, Illinois. the Intended Beneficiaries Include a Variety of Stakeholders (e.g., Hate Crime Victims, Victim Service Providers, Policymakers, Researchers). We Will Partner With Niot to Develop the Generalized Hbat Model and Conduct Implementation Case Studies of Two Localized Adaptations of the Model. We Will Collaborate With Hate Crime Victims, Using Participatory Research Methods. We Will Also Convene an Advisory Group of Subject Matter Experts Who Will Offer Guidance on the Generalized Model. Ca/ncf
Committed
$686,997
Paid out
$525.1K
76%
Committed, not yet paid
$161.9K
24%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.