Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Ojjdps Juvenile Justice Evidence Translation Project Aims to Increase the Identification and Use of Evidence-based Approaches, and Promising and Best Practices, for Addressing the Needs of At-risk and Juvenile Justice System-involved Youths, Their Families, and Their Communities. to Accomplish Ojjdps Goals for This Project, We Will Undertake a Systematic Curation of Juvenile Justice Research and Knowledge in Key Focus Areas and Emerging Topics. This Curation Will Build on and Expand the Model Programs Guide and Crimesolutions, Capturing Not Only Rigorous Empirical Research, But Also Other Credible Knowledge. Development Services Group (DSG) Has Selected Five Potential Topics: 1) Implementing Quality Diversion Programs for At-risk Youth Before Court Involvement; 2) Improving Access to and Quality of Community-based Mental Health Supports for At-risk and System-involved Youth; 3) Incorporating Trauma-informed Approaches Throughout the Continuum of Care; 4) Using Credible Messengers With High-risk Youth Living in the Community; 5) the Role of Medicaid in Providing Services to Youth After Leaving Residential Care. DSG Will Develop Carefully Tailored Translational Tools and Other Resources on What Works in Juvenile Justice, Based on a Diverse Array of Different Knowledge Bases. the Resources Will Be Accessible, Comprehensible, Action-oriented, and User-friendly, to Ensure That Nonresearcher Practitioners and Lay Persons Can Apply the Information to Create and Sustain Positive Change Across the Juvenile Justice Continuum. Topical Areas, Content, and Delivery Mechanisms Will All Be Developed With Input From Youth Who Have Lived Experience in the Juvenile Justice System, Their Families, and Other Stakeholders.
Committed
$962,180
Paid out
$609.2K
63%
Committed, not yet paid
$353.0K
37%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…