Federal grant · project grant (b)
Using Evidence-based Strategies and a Thorough Data-collection Plan Developed With Assistance From Researchers at the University of South Carolina, Colleton Countys Proposal Seeks to Take More Offenders Off the Street for Longer Periods. This Would Be Accomplished by Arming Prosecutors With the Evidence Necessary to Add and Upgrade Charges and Convict Defendants Who Would Otherwise Have Gone Undetected. Intelligence Would Be Shared With Circuit Law Enforcement Agencies, Enhancing Their Investigations and Expanding Their Scope. Where Necessary, the Intelligence Unit Stands Ready to Coordinate Operations Between Them. the Solicitors Office Also Hopes to Parlay Metrics Associated With This Project Into Advocacy for Criminal Justice Reform in South Carolina. for Instance, Evidence That Gang Activity Is Prevalent Supports Efforts to Enact County-level Investigative Grand Juries, Which Are Currently Lacking Under State Law. the Project Also Includes an Evaluation of Its Strategy and Identification of Best Practices for the Investigation and Prosecution of Criminal Enterprises.
Committed
$272,892
Paid out
$272.2K
100%
Committed, not yet paid
$710
<1%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…