Federal grant · project grant (b)
The Second Judicial District Court (SJDC) of Washoe County, Nevada Requests $950,000 to Strengthen Its Existing Veterans Treatment Court (VTC) Through Enhanced Treatment Access and Supportive Services. the SJDC Is Located in Washoe County, the Second Largest County in Nevada, the Estimated 2023 Population Is 506,016. Created in 2009, the VTC of the Second Judicial District Court Aims to Help Veterans Presently Serving or Who Have Served in the Armed Forces, a Reserve Component Thereof or the National Guard. the VTC Targets Non-violent, Justice-involved Veterans Suffering From Mental Illness, Alcohol or Substance Use, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder or Military Sexual Trauma. the VTC Follows a Traditional Team Approach, Consistent With NADCP'S10 Key Components. Through the Bja FY23 Veteran Treatment Court Discretionary Program, Category 2: Enhancement, SJDC Seeks to Enhance Its VTC by Incorporating Evidence-based Principles, Specifically Addressing Key Component #1, 3, 4, and 5: (1) Employ a VTC Specialty Court Coordinator to Perform Direct Casework Related to Supervision, Rehabilitation, Case Management of VTC Participants; (2) Enhance the Newly Established VTC Peer Mentor Program; (3) Enhance Random Drug Testing; and (4) Identify Eligible Participants Early and Promptly Through Evaluation and Assessment; (5) Increase Availability of Treatment, Including Medication Assisted Treatment, and Housing Services for Clients. Outcomes Are Improved, Social Functioning and Linkage to Employment, Housing, Treatment, Medication, and Support Services. During the 4-YEAR Project Period, VTC Proposes to Serve Approximately 65 New Participants. the Project Will Also Enhance Public Awareness and Outreach Efforts, Including Public Naloxone Training and Dissemination for the High-risk Recently Incarcerated Population.
Committed
$945,461
Paid out
$298.2K
32%
Committed, not yet paid
$647.3K
68%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…