Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Description:this Agreement Provides Funding to Mapleton Water District in Oregon to Implement Its Project to Make Water System Improvements as Directed in the 2022 Consolidated Appropriations Act. Activities:the Activities to Be Performed Include the Execution and Implementation of a Drinking Water Infrastructure Construction Project. Workplan Activities Consist of: Replacing Approximately 2,600 Linear Feet of 70-YEAR-OLD 4-INCH Asbestos-concrete Distribution Line as Well as Related Valves and Hydrants. Subrecipient:no Subawards Are Included in This Assistance Agreement.outcomes:the Anticipated Deliverables Include Replacement of Water Distribution Line and Related Valves and Hydrants. the Expected Outcomes Include: Reduction of System Leakage, Reduction of Operation and Maintenance Costs, and a More Reliable Drinking Water System. the Intended Beneficiaries Include the Customers of the Mapleton Water District.
Committed
$800,000
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…