Federal grant · project grant (b)
Description:this Agreement Provides Funding Under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) to Air Alliance Houston (aah). Specifically, the Project Will Build the Capacity of Communities and Governments Along the Texas Gulf Coast to Evaluate and Redress Environmental and Climate Injustices. Air Alliance Houston Will Also Support Direct and Meaningful Participation of Fence Line Residents of the Texas Gulf Coast in Environmental and Climate Decisions, Solutions, Policies, and Programs. Activities:the Activities Include (1) Conducting Community-based and Citizen-science Initiatives That Inform Government Processes Related to Environmental and Climate Justice; (2) Preparing, Training, and Educating Impacted Communities on How to Engage in Government Processes Related to Environmental and Climate Justice; (3) Facilitating the Meaningful Engagement of Impacted Communities in Government Processes Related to Environmental and Climate Justice With a Focus on Permitting Decisions; Land Use, Highway Construction, and Infrastructure Decisions; and Developing Cbp/cbas in the Region. Subrecipient:subaward 1 (statutory Partner) to Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC) for Method 4 Will Assist the Project Through Overall Project Management, Monitoring of Project-level Environmental Outputs and Outcomes, Providing Training and Other Capacity-building Activities to the Partner Organizations, and Evaluating the Efficacy of the Project Overall. Subaward 2 (collaborating Entity) to Coalition for Environment, Equity, and Resilience (CEER) for Methods 1-3 in Brazoria, Fort Bend, Galveston, and Liberty Counties of Texas Will Advance the Project Goals by Compiling Data on Permitted Facilities, Educating Community Members About the Air Permit Decision-making Process Using Airmail, Building Relationships With Community Members and Local Groups, Supporting Community Members to Give Meaningful Input on Air Permits Through Training and Tools, Monitoring Permits for Denials and Improvements, and Building Relationships With Government Agencies and Officials to Improve Permits and Rules. Subaward 3 (collaborating Entity) to Community In-power and Development Association Inc. (CIDA) for Methods 1-3 in Jefferson and Orange Counties of Texas Will Advance the Project Goals by Compiling Data on Permitted Facilities, Educating Community Members About the Air Permit Decision-making Process Using Airmail, Building Relationships With Community Members and Local Groups, Supporting Community Members to Give Meaningful Input on Air Permits Through Training and Tools, Monitoring Permits for Denials and Improvements, and Building Relationships With Government Agencies and Officials to Improve Permits and Rules. Subaward 4 (collaborating Entity) to Ingleside on the Bay Coastal Watch Association (IOBCWA) for Methods 1-3 in Aransas, Nueces, and San Patricio Counties of Texas Will Assist the Project Through Collecting Citizen Science and Other Data on Permitted Facilities, Educating Community Members About the Air Permit Decision-making Process Using Airmail, Building Relationships With Community Members and Local Groups, Supporting Community Members to Give Meaningful Input on Air Permits Through Training and Tools, Monitoring Permits for Denials and Improvements, and Building Relationships With Government Agencies and Officials to Improve Permits and Rules. Outcomes:the Anticipated Deliverables Include 3 Community-based Research Initiatives And/or Research Products Published on Environmental and Climate Concerns Reflecting Community Opinions and Preferences; 4,000 Community Residents Who Complete a Training That Builds Their Capacity to Participate in Government Processes; 108 Educational Meetings or Events Held Between Governmental Officials, Decision-makers, and Community Members; 9 Policies Influenced by Community Recommendations (e.g., Through a New Advisory Council, Participatory Budgeting, Rule-making); 12 Polluting Permits, Projects, or Policies Slowed or Sto
Committed
$3.0 Million
Paid out
$61.9K
2%
Committed, not yet paid
$3.0M
98%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.