Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Description:this Action Approves an Award in the Amount of $1,284,481 to the B.F. Smith Foundation to Improve the Water Quality of the Gulf of Mexico. On-farm Demonstrations Will Be Conducted to Evaluate Innovative Technologies and Strategies That Can Be Integrated Into Farming Systems to Directly Address Nutrient and Sediment Loading Into Waterbodies. Activities:project Activities Include Characterizing Agricultural and Ecological Systems, Identifying Constraints to Sustainable Agriculture, Designing Plans for Adapting Cover Crop Minimum Tillage Systems, and Evaluating Advanced Nutrient Management Strategies and Environmental Outcomes. Also, the Knowledge Gained From This Project Will Be Disseminated Through Farmer-to-farmer Exchange.subrecipient:no Subawards Are Included in This Assistance Agreement.outcomes:greater Than 5% Pollutant Reduction Will Be Documented Within a Selected Waterbody by Reducing the Use of Synthetic Fertilizers and Replacing or Supplementing These Fertilizers With Carbon-based Fertilizers and Implementing Cover Crop Minimum Tillage Systems. These Systems Will Be Demonstrated on a Minimum of 12,000 Acres, With a Focus on Non-irrigated Fields and Pivot Irrigated Fields. Advanced Nutrient Management Systems Using Carbon-based Fertilizer and Minimum Tillage Systems Will Be Demonstrated on 1,500 Acres. Measurable Changes Will Be Documented Using Premier Digital Nitrogen Management Software as Well as Water Quality Monitoring. Also, Farmer-to-farmer Outreach and Exchanges Will Impact at Least 500 Individuals Annually. Agricultural Landowners and Residents of the Mississippi Delta Will Benefit From Improved Water Quality Through the Reduction of Nutrient Loads to the Gulf of Mexico.
Committed
$1.3 Million
Paid out
$370.7K
29%
Committed, not yet paid
$913.8K
71%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…