Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Description:this Action Provides Funding in the Amount of $120,000 to Urban Sustainability Directors Network to Support the Environmental Finance Center (EFC) at the Southeast Sustainability Directors Network (ssdn).the Activities Include Helping Communities Identify Funding Opportunities Responsive to Their Needs, Provides Technical Assistance Around Understanding Solicitation Requirements, and Offers Training on Federal Tools and Resources That Can Inform Competitive Proposals. the Anticipated Deliverables Include Providing Direct Services to Local and Tribal Governments and Community Organizations, Conducting Webinar-based Trainings and Facilitating a Cohort Focused on Funding Programs, Leading Monthly Workgroups to Build Local Government Capacity, Facilitating Peer-to-peer Exchange for Communities to Share Grant Experiences and Insights, Hosting Meetings to Provide Capacity Building for Communities, Creating a Resource Library of Documents (like RFPS, Solicitations Costs, Etc.) to Inform Local Governments About Appropriate Expenditures, Publishing a Best Practice Guide and Case Studies of Recurrent or New Discretionary Grants and Hosting Partner Consultations With Non-governmental and Community Organizations. the Expected Outcomes Include Local Governments Developing Greater Capacity to Apply for and Manage Federal Funding, Federal Funding Is More Accessible to Communities Due to Improved Project Quality and Best Practices Are Developed for Scaling Sustainability Best Practices and Financing. the Intended Beneficiaries Include Disadvantaged Communities. There Are No Subawards Included in This Assistance Agreement.activities:the Activities Include Helping Communities Identify Funding Opportunities Responsive to Their Needs, Provides Technical Assistance Around Understanding Solicitation Requirements, and Offers Training on Federal Tools and Resources That Can Inform Competitive Proposals.subrecipient:no Subawards Are Included in This Assistance Agreement.outcomes:the Anticipated Deliverables Include Providing Direct Services to Local and Tribal Governments and Community Organizations, Conducting Webinar-based Trainings and Facilitating a Cohort Focused on Funding Programs, Leading Monthly Workgroups to Build Local Government Capacity, Facilitating Peer-to-peer Exchange for Communities to Share Grant Experiences and Insights, Hosting Meetings to Provide Capacity Building for Communities, Creating a Resource Library of Documents (like RFPS, Solicitations Costs, Etc.) to Inform Local Governments About Appropriate Expenditures, Publishing a Best Practice Guide and Case Studies of Recurrent or New Discretionary Grants and Hosting Partner Consultations With Non-governmental and Community Organizations. the Expected Outcomes Include Local Governments Developing Greater Capacity to Apply for and Manage Federal Funding, Federal Funding Is More Accessible to Communities Due to Improved Project Quality and Best Practices Are Developed for Scaling Sustainability Best Practices and Financing. the Intended Beneficiaries Include Disadvantaged Communities.
Committed
$803,945
Paid out
$205.3K
26%
Committed, not yet paid
$598.6K
74%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.