Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Description: This Action Approves an Award in the Amount of $499,638 to Eckerd College in Florida. the Purpose of This Award Is to Enhance Land Protection and Conservation in Priority Landscapes of the Gulf of Mexico. Activities: the Activities to Be Performed Include Creating an Innovative Phone Application to Reduce Consumption of Unnecessary Single-use Plastic by Individuals and Provide Plastic Use and Refusal Data to Guide Sustainability Policies. Outcomes: the Anticipated Deliverables Include a Mobile Phone Application, Cleanup Events, and Data Sharing. Expected Outcomes Include Preventing Single-use Plastic From Entering the Environment, Removing Urban Debris, Enhancing Habitat in the Tampa Bay Estuary, and Making ST. Petersburg, FL a More Resilient Community. Intended Beneficiaries Will Be the Communities Near or Located in ST. Petersburg and Tampa Bay, FL, Who Will Benefit From Enhanced Land Protection and Conservation. Subrecipient Activities Will Be Funded to Perform Cleanup Events and Outreach Activities. Subrecipient:
Committed
$499,638
Paid out
$477.6K
96%
Committed, not yet paid
$22.0K
4%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…